Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who could file claims with the Commission before the deadline?

The law that created the Commission is the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief
Commission Act (the “TIRC Act”). That law said that a claim can be filed before the
Commission by anyone who has a “claim of torture.” A claim can also be fined by any court,
person, or agency on behalf of someone else who has a “claim of torture.” The law defines
an eligible “claim of torture:”

      "Claim of torture" means a claim on behalf of a living person convicted of a felony
       in Illinois asserting that he was tortured into confessing to the crime for which the
       person was convicted and the tortured confession was used to obtain the conviction
       and for which there is some credible evidence related to allegations of torture
       committed by Commander Jon Burge or any officer under the supervision of Jon

The claim must therefore be made by or on behalf of:

-      a living person,

-      convicted of a felony in Illinois, and

-      who claims he (or she) was tortured into confessing to the crime of conviction.

-      The tortured confession must have been used to obtain the conviction, and

-      there must be some credible evidence,

-      related to allegations of torture committed by Jon Burge or an officer under Burge’s

All six of these requirements must be met.

2. I was tortured by an officer who had worked under Jon Burge, but my arrest and
confession were after Burge supervised that officer. What will the Commission do with
my claim?

The Commission believes that claims of torture against officers who had previously
worked for Jon Burge are “related to allegations of torture committed by Commander Jon
Burge or any officer under the supervision of Jon Burge,” as required by the TIRC Act. For
that reason, the Commission will accept and act on your claim.
You should know, however, that at least one Circuit Judge has ruled that the
Commission does not have authority over such cases. The Commission does not agree with
that ruling, and will continue acting on such cases unless there is a clear appellate ruling that
the Commission does not have authority over cases involving officers who formerly worked
for Jon Burge.

3. Are new claims still being accepted?

No.  Under the TIRC Act, all claims were required to be filed by August 10, 2014.

4. Will the Commission still exist after the cutoff date?

Yes, the Commission intends to keep working until it completes the cases that were pending 
before it on August 10, 2014. An additional period of approximately 2 years will likely be 
needed to complete all work.

5. I was tortured, but my claim doesn’t have anything to do with Jon Burge. 

The Commission has accepted claims that are not against Jon Burge or officers who worked for him.  At this point, our ability to address claims that do not involve officers who served under Jon Burge is uncertain.

On June 18, 2014, the Commission issued an Order Concerning Jurisdiction in the case of Jaime Hauad.  That Order discusses the 
Commission's view of the language, legislative history, and meaning of the TIRC Act.  The Order can be downloaded here.

6. In what order is the Commission deciding cases?

The TIRC Act says that the Commission must give priority to those cases in which
the convicted person is currently incarcerated solely for the crime to which he or she claims
torture by Jon Burge or officers under his command, or both. The Commission will give
priority to those cases, then start working on cases for which it has jurisdiction.

7. What relief can the Commission give?

Explaining this point is somewhat complicated, because of Illinois’ complicated
system for providing post-conviction relief to persons convicted of crimes.

-      Convicted persons normally have a brief period in Illinois to file a post-conviction
        remedy, absent exceptions that show a violation of constitutional rights, such as
        newly discovered evidence or proof of actual innocence. If the petition is brought
        later, the convicted person must convince the court that he or she is entitled to a full
        hearing before the court will hold a hearing to take evidence of a violation.

-       If a claim is brought to the Commission, TIRC investigates the cases brought before
        it to see if there is credible evidence of torture that merits judicial review. The
        Commission can investigate the case and refer the claim even if the claimant has not
        met normal procedural deadlines.

-       If a case is referred to the Circuit Court by TIRC, it automatically gives the claimant
        the opportunity for a full hearing before a judge. If the Circuit Judge decides that it
        is likely that a confession was coerced, the judge can award a new trial to the

-      The Commission also has the discretion to refer evidence of criminal acts,
        professional misconduct, or other wrongdoing to the appropriate authority.

8. Does the Commission have to be sure that torture occurred before it makes a referral
to Court?

No. If 5 or more of the 8 voting members of the Commission conclude by a
preponderance of the evidence that there is sufficient evidence of torture to merit judicial
review, the case shall be referred to the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court. The Commission
interprets this language to be the rough equivalent of a “probable cause” determination. The
Commission does not have to decide it is more likely than not that torture occurred, but it
must decide that there is sufficient credible evidence of torture for a claimant to deserve his
or her day in court.

9. What if I disagree with the Commission’s decision?

The decision of the Commission is final, but it is possible that it may be subject to
court review. If you file a claim and the Commission rules against you, you may have a
limited time to file a petition for Administrative Review with the Circuit Court. You should
immediately consult an attorney.

10. Are the Commission’s determinations binding on the Court?

That is for the courts to decide.   In general, the Commission’s decisions give claimants the
right to a full hearing in court.  There may be individual cases where the Commission makes
factual findings that events more likely than not occurred.  There is an argument that those findings
are entitled to special deference in court.  The court will have to determine how much deference should
be given those findings and the Commission’s decisions

11. What kind of waiver do I have to sign to proceed with the Commission?

The TIRC Act requires that a claimant must waive his or her right against self-incrimination
in order for the Commission to conduct a formal inquiry into a claim of torture.
The claimant must agree to provide full disclosure regarding inquiry requirements of the
Commission. The waiver does not apply to matters unrelated to a convicted person's claim
of torture.
The Commission does not routinely ask claimants whether they committed the crime
for which they were convicted. But it reserves the right to ask questions related to a
convicted person’s claim of torture in some cases that could potentially be incriminating.

12. I think I have newly discovered evidence or another reason to file a new post-conviction
proceeding? Can I go before the commission and also proceed in court with a post-conviction

Yes. Both remedies are independent.

13. I heard that Judge Biebel recently appointed a Special Master for Burge cases. How
does that affect the Commission?

Judge Biebel recently appointed Dean David Yellen of the Loyola Law School as a
Special Master. The appointment of a Special Master by Judge Biebel does not affect either
TIRC’s processes, or the Court’s. The Special Master’s sole task is to search for any and all
prisoners who are still incarcerated and who may have what Judge Biebel called a "valid
claim.” The elements of a "valid claim" include all of the following:

-       The individual was convicted based in part upon a confession;

-       The confession was the end result of an interrogation in which Burge or
        officers under his chain of command or direct supervision participated;

-       The individual made an allegation of coercion in the context of his original
         proceedings, either at a motion to suppress or in some other clear and
        definitive way, that his confession was the product of physical abuse or
        torture, and those objections were overruled;

-       He remains incarcerated today; and

-       He has never had the opportunity to present his claim of coerced confession
        with the benefit of the substantial evidence now available to implicate Burge
        and those who worked under him.

Once someone with a valid claim is identified, Judge Biebel’s order says that the Judge will
appoint pro bono counsel. The Commission will be happy to work with the appointed
counsel in evaluating a claim.

14. So will TIRC still hear cases even though there is now a Special Master?


15. I already have filed a claim with TIRC, but I also have a “valid claim” as defined by
Judge Biebel. What does this mean for me?

Any claimants who are already before the Commission and are identified by the
Special Master would likely be eligible to have free, pro bono counsel appointed by Judge
Biebel. The Commission will continue to investigate your claim.

16. I heard the Commission has had its funding cut off by the State. Is it able to complete
its business?

For a period in 2012-13, the Commission did not receive funding from the state
government. Funding was restored in 2013, and the Governor’s Ofice has committed to
providing the Commission with at least the same, if not more funding, for the next fiscal
year. The Commission is currently being funded at an adequate level to do its job. In
addition to its Executive Director, the Commission has added a staff attorney and has
retained a retired federal law enforcement agent to act as an investigator.

17. What rights does a crime victim have?

Under the TIRC Act, the victim of the crime (or if the victim of the crime is deceased,
the next of kin of the victim, which shall be the parent, spouse, child, or sibling of the
deceased victim) has the right to present his or her views and concerns throughout the
Commission's investigation. The victim is permitted to attend proceedings otherwise closed
to the public, subject to any limitations imposed by this Act, and subject to Section 2(c)(14)
of the Open Meetings Act.

18. How do I get in touch with the Commission?

You can write to the Commission at Suite 10-300, 100 West Randolph, Chicago, IL

Copyright © 2013 State of Illinois